Perhaps my opinion of UG will change with the next version though. If I had a choice, I would probably use Solidworks over UG any day, but the company I work for is too good to give up. On the other hand, UG's expressions are alot better than Solidworks equations, though the Solidworks sketch is better than UG's so I find myself using less equations than in UG.get the idea.

There's a lot of power in UG to create features but simple things like changing the extrude end condition from a blind depth to a through all or up to surface isn't editable later on, delete the feature and start over, or link expressions or something. I'm using NX2 so it's hard to tell what the future holds. UG is not as easy as Solidworks, mostly due to an old interface heritage which will hopefully go away soon (NX4?). SolidWorks? ewh (Aerospace) 13 Oct 05 08:58

What these softwares share is the working phylosophy and the basic principles, and some common aspects of the GUI as well. Are there parts of your job for which SW is unadequate? If so, which ones? Do you plan to expand activity in fields where you already know that SW won't be able to accomplish the work? Are you part of a manufacturing chain where machining post-pro or other aspects are necessary? Which software(s) do your suppliers/customers use, that you may consider to 'match' in order to better interoperate? etc.ДЄs you already know and use SW, my opinion is that you should have a strong reason to change (or, it may be a simple question of 'feeling': I personally can't stand SolidEdge, but it's my personal opinion and not really based on the software's capabilities).Д«TW, I really don't find that SW is extremely similar to SE, even less that it is similar to Pro/E, and it won't be similar to UG or Catia.

Siemens unigraphics nx training